IS

Aronson, Jay E.

Topic Weight Topic Terms
0.782 group gss support groups systems brainstorming research process electronic members results paper effects individual ebs
0.377 creativity ideas idea creative individual generation techniques individuals problem support cognitive ideation stimuli memory generate
0.176 task fit tasks performance cognitive theory using support type comprehension tools tool effects effect matching

Focal Researcher     Coauthors of Focal Researcher (1st degree)     Coauthors of Coauthors (2nd degree)

Note: click on a node to go to a researcher's profile page. Drag a node to reallocate. Number on the edge is the number of co-authorships.

Dennis, Alan R. 2 Carte, Traci A. 1 Garfield, Monica J. 1 Haley, Barbara J. 1
Heninger, William G. 1 Valacich, Joseph S. 1 Walker II, Edward D. 1
Group Support Systems 2 Groupware 2 Brainstorming 1 Cognitive Inertia 1
electronic brainstorming 1 entrainment 1 Idea Generation 1 problem structure 1
time 1

Articles (2)

STRUCTURING TIME AND TASK IN ELECTRONIC BRAINSTORMING. (MIS Quarterly, 1999)
Authors: Abstract:
    There are many ways in which a group support system (GSS) can be used to support group brainstorming. This paper reports the results of an experiment that manipulated task structure and time structure. Groups electronically brainstormed on intact tasks (where all parts of the task were presented simultaneously) or on partitioned tasks (where three subcategories of the task were presented to the groups). The time periods in which groups worked were either one 30-minute time period or three 10-minute periods separated by two-minute breaks. Groups in the partitioned task treatment generated 40% more ideas, but there were no time effects. These differences are attributed to the ability of the partitioned task to refocus members' attention more evenly across the entire solution space.
Research Report: The Effectiveness of Multiple Dialogues in Electronic Brainstorming. (Information Systems Research, 1997)
Authors: Abstract:
    Members of brainstorming groups often pursue the same set of ideas rather than considering a wide and diverse range of ideas, which may reduce the number of ideas they produce. One way to reduce this cognitive inertia may be to encourage groups to engage in several simultaneous discussions or dialogues. This experiment, which studied groups brainstorming electronically, found that groups generated more ideas, more high-quality ideas, and more novel ideas when using multiple dialogues than when using single dialogues.